The reason why so many people are now turning to Revit is that its capabilities go far beyond simple building design.

Whilst AutoCAD comprises an accomplished drafting toolset for all design disciplines, Revit’s original focus was on designing buildings. But what’s the main difference between AutoCAD and Revit? It’s been in the market since 2000, although it wasn’t until 2002 that it was purchased by Autodesk. Revit in its current form is still relatively new when compared to the maturity of AutoCAD. Does this mean you should use Revit instead of AutoCAD? As we eluded to above, it all depends on what you are trying to achieve. There’s been a significant push from design consultancies and contractors alike to adopt Revit, the ever-increasing requirement to deliver BIM on projects being a primary driver. But in the era of BIM, the rules seem to be changing. From creating construction drawings to 3D modelling and visualisations, pretty much everything is possible in AutoCAD. One of the keys to AutoCAD’s success has been its versatility, enabling users to perform a very wide variety of tasks. It has been the go-to software for architectural, engineering and drafting firms for several decades. A little bit of historyĪutoCAD has been in the market since 1982. Whilst both Revit and AutoCAD can produce 2D drawings, 3D models and renders, the workflows they use can vary considerably. Understanding your desired outcome and outputs will definitely help you make a better decision. If you’re wondering whether you should be using Revit or AutoCAD in your projects, there’s another key question you should ask yourself: what am I trying to achieve?Īlthough both Autodesk software packages have some similarities, they operate and ‘feel’ quite different.

Revit cad